There are a few compelling reasons why I switched from Debian/Ubuntu to FreeBSD 10.x. This was written after using FreeBSD 10.1 for more than 3 months, and is now on my production PC/workstation.


Debian stable comes with a large tested repository with regular security updates, but a bit old software, same case is with Ubuntu LTS the software starts getting a little old. FreeBSD on the other hand packages (credit volunteers) the most recent software possible, the current number of packages on FreeBSD stands around ~24k, which is comparable to Debian. Debian splits every application into binaries, documentation, *-devel so the number looks bigger on Debian/Ubuntu.


One of the reason to use Debian over Ubuntu and any other GNU/Linux distribution is its stability. You deploy an application and it runs without much maintenance, FreeBSD is also know for its stability. So its a tie.


Now this is where FreeBSD stands out, with an impressive manual which covers most necessary things a user might require. The other projects which can compete are Arch and Gentoo. Debian falls short here.

Package management:

Debian is known for its  package manager apt-get/aptitude(dpkg), Arch’s new pacman is also a good contender. FreeBSD was lacking one until version 9 or 10 when it started including pkg. This is another reason which made me try FreeBSD, or, I was reluctant to use a distribution where the primary way to install applications was compiling them from source. pkg is good enough with room for improvement, behaves like apt-get but with a single command like yum. No more apt-cache, apt-get,dpkg for different things, makes my life simple.

Enterprise Features:

Some of the features like BSD jails, zfs, boot environment really impressed me. Why? Because I have seen enterprise Unix/Linux teams struggle with virtualization, storage management with VMware, KVM, veritas volume manager, etc Then I saw how Solaris 10 solved it with zones, ZFS, and boot environments.

This made me wonder how do CentOS/Debian stack up?

For containers – we have Linux containers(LXC) but they are not as robust as OpenVZ containers, but OpenVZ is not supported in the mainline kernel, you have to install a custom vzkernel. Some kernel space applications don’t work with a modified kernel and modifying the default setup voids warranty! You don’t get support if you are not using the stock kernel.

GNU/Linux still does not have a default go to container virtualization, I don’t consider Docker here, as its just LXC with enhancements(at the time of writing), it also follows a different path, I prefer the Unix way. There are no plans to include OpenVZ support into the mainline kernel.

On Storage front GNU/Linux has ZFS on Linux(zol) but it is not native yet, still under development and missing features. Btrfs is new, struggles with performance. I wonder why does not Oracle license ZFS on a bi/tri license like Mozilla, instead of developing yet another file system.

What about LVM? – Why do you need another layer of management when the file systems acts as both filesystem, vloume manager ?  Use ZFS!

Both FreeBSD and Solaris have boot environment support. This makes it easy to upgrade your production servers and switch back if you face any issues with the new environment. Updating servers is fun!

GNU/Linux equivalent is not robust yet.

Other goodies:

There are some other reasons to choose FreeBSD, like managing services with rc.conf, compare this with CentOS 6 where you use chkconfig, on Debian update-rc.d. CentOS chkconfig is pretty easy to get used to but Debian’s update-rc.d feels like it is still under development.

Unlike GNU/Linux which uses SysV init, there are no run levels in FreeBSD, only user modes like single, multi and other states like reboot, halt. I still could not understand the rationale behind run levels and why do we need them.


Debian is known for its stability, large repository of applications. However it does fall short in other spheres.

Arch and Gentoo though having good documentation, large software application support, still fall behind in areas like package management, stability and ease of use, like the core repository of Arch is not large enough, the security advisory support is not reliable and things tend to break. Gentoo expects you to compile. I can’t, and I prefer to use package mangers.

FreeBSD becomes a good alternative in such comparison. However, FreeBSD still needs to improve on drivers and laptop support(FreeBSD cannot be at fault, vendors!), and it will, as the user base increases, it can come on par with any GNU/Linux distribution. I have seen how Ubuntu evolved release after release and how it improved.

Personally, I am getting old and just need a cozy comfortable environment and consistent way of managing things, FreeBSD provides that.

Think I have got something right/wrong? Comment below with references and links. If you are a new user to FLOSS world, I recommend starting with something easier like PC-BSD or GhostBSD. If you prefer GNU/Linux try Linux Mint. If you are an experienced user, try running FreeBSD on a spare machine or in a virtual machine(for example using Oracle VirtualBox).